Happy Jan 6!
I'm torn about which debate to dissect.
1) Alex Jones debating Destiny and the Krassensteins about 1/6.
2) Nick Rekieta debating Destiny about 1/6.
I know that Alex is obviously more popular, but that debate(from what I saw) came across as a whole bunch of folks who have struggle sessions in understanding legal arguments/issues. In the Nick Debate, there is more legal theory. But you guys decide.
Justice Thomas said in his response “I am not sure that today’s opinion will stand the test of time."
I don't understand what that means?? My understanding is that the ruling is final. Is he saying there are other legal avenues to challenge this ruling or birthright citizenship in the future that were not used in this one?