Good Lawgic
Politics • Lifestyle • Comedy
Good Lawgic is designed to provide unique insight on current political events presented with humor and without any pussy footing.

On this local page, I will post unique content outside current events that will not air on YouTube.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Learn more first

@JoeNierman @RobertBarnes @vivafrei

I wanted to share a strategic concept for consideration regarding Libertarian Party of New York (LPNY) ballot access—specifically a parallel, underutilized pathway grounded in existing New York election law.

Core Concept
Rather than relying exclusively on the gubernatorial cycle for ballot access, LPNY can pursue a complementary and potentially more durable route through the judicial nominating convention process. This involves participation in elections for delegates to the New York State Supreme Court nominating conventions, administered under NYSUCS and NYSBOE frameworks.

Why This Matters
• Reduces dependency on high-cost, statewide campaigns
• Avoids the significant petition thresholds tied to gubernatorial races
• Establishes a repeatable, lower-barrier entry point into the ballot system
• Creates a structural presence within an existing, legally recognized electoral mechanism

Strategic Advantages
• Delegate races are typically low-competition outside major party structures
• The process is fully compliant with current New York Election Law
• The model is scalable across judicial districts once proven
• Provides influence—direct or indirect—within the judicial selection process

Mid-Hudson / 3rd Judicial District as Pilot
The Mid-Hudson / Capital Region presents a viable pilot environment due to its manageable scale and relative political independence. A focused effort here could establish proof of concept before broader statewide replication.

Operational Approach
• Recruit LPNY-aligned delegate candidates
• Coordinate filings through NYSBOE procedures
• Execute targeted petitioning efforts (substantially lighter than statewide races)
• Build a repeatable election-cycle infrastructure

Framing and Positioning
This effort can be publicly framed as:
• Expanding voter choice in an otherwise closed process
• Promoting transparency in judicial selection
• Challenging entrenched political machinery with lawful participation

Collaboration Opportunity
I propose we explore coordination on:
• Candidate identification and recruitment
• Petition strategy and execution
• Alignment with broader LPNY ballot access objectives

This is not a workaround—it is a lawful, existing pathway that has simply been underutilized. Properly executed, it offers a durable foothold within New York’s political structure.

I welcome your thoughts and would be glad to discuss further or help develop this into an actionable plan for the upcoming cycle.

Best regards,
/S/ Harold William Van Allen

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Learn more first
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Ya gotta laugh

PS Im in Baltimore. I aint getting in til 1230 earliest. So no show.

00:01:24
The Responsibilities of Man and How That Relates To Locals
00:08:50
Re: Election Fraud
00:07:30
23 hours ago
March 20, 2026

@JoeNierman

JOHN JAY COMMITTEE

POSITION PAPER #1

Judicial Selection Integrity in New York State

I. Title

Structural Control of Judicial Selection in New York:
A Constitutional Analysis of the Judicial Nominating Convention System

II. Executive Summary

This paper advances the following core conclusion:

New York’s judicial nominating convention system concentrates effective control over judicial selection in party-controlled delegate processes, thereby limiting meaningful electoral participation and raising constitutional concerns under modern First Amendment, Equal Protection, and ballot access jurisprudence.

While upheld facially in New York State Board of Elections v. Lopez Torres, the system’s real-world operation reveals a structural gatekeeping mechanism that warrants renewed scrutiny.

III. Background: The Current System

A. Selection Process
• Supreme Court Justice candidates are not chosen via direct primary
• Instead:
1. Voters elect judicial convention delegates
2. Delegates attend judicial nominating conventions
3. Conventions select party nominees

B. Practical Reality

In practice, delegate elections are often:
• Low ...

Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals